HomeYour VoiceHerStoryYour MultimediaResource LibraryAbout WVMCode of ConductRegisterLog in

  • Latest Post
  • Post index
  • Archives
  • Categories
  • Latest comments
  • Contact
  • Post Something
  • « ATTENTION VOTERS of the COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA!
  • ARE YOU READY TO FACE THE TRUTH? »

Gender Differences in Voter Turnout

Gender Differences in Voter Turnout
Posted by jj on Apr 12, 2026 in Newsworthy
Gender Differences in Voter Turnout

As a followup to the reactions and comments to our recent post on women and voting, we offer the following reports from:

The Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP). 2026. “Gender Differences in Voter Registration and Turnout.” New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University-New Brunswick. https://cawp.rutgers.edu/data/voters/gender-differences-voter-registration-and-turnout (Accessed April 6, 2026).

 

Proportion of Eligible Adult Population Who Reported Voting

2020       men  65% = 72.5 million

                Women  68.4% = 82.2 million

 

2024          men  63.7 % = 72.8 million

                   Women  66.9% = 81.5 million

Methodology

Data are from the U.S. Bureau of the Census Current Population Reports, Series P-20, "Voting and Registration in the Election of November 1964" and subsequent reports for all years. These figures are from post-election responses to supplementary questions in the monthly Current Population Survey for a sample of households in November of each election year. Respondents to the survey report their own voting activity and that of other members of their household. The sample systematically over-reports both voting and registration by several million people. In years prior to 1996, the questions used to determine citizenship measures were asked in different ways, and the U.S. Bureau of the Census advises some caution in direct comparison across these years.

Key Data Points for Women in the U.S.

  • 2020 Census:168,763,470 females (50.9% of the total population).
  • 2024 Projections:~171.77 million females (based on data from, Note: alternative estimates exist based on specific data sets).
  • 2024 Voter Statistics:Roughly 91.3 million women were projected to have voted in the 2024 election cycle. 

Progress Toward Gender Parity Stalled in Election 2024.

But There’s More to the Story.

The 2024 election did not mark significant changes in women’s political representation. While women’s representation increased at the state legislative level as a result of last year’s election, there were no net gains for women in statewide elective executive and congressional offices. The number of women governors momentarily reached a record high in early 2025, only to fall back to match the count of women top state executives serving in 2024. This report analyzes women’s electoral success in 2024, focusing on the numbers, and puts it into historical context — with special attention to how 2024 compared to the three elections that preceded it.

This report details the numeric gains and sites for stasis for women in congressional, statewide elective executive, and state legislative office, with particular attention to differences with men, between parties, and among women of different racial and ethnic groups. Together, they demonstrate that the trend toward gender parity in political leadership is inconsistent and that evaluating progress for women requires attentiveness to differences across party, race and ethnicity, geography, and time.

These outcomes for women came in the midst of a highly-contested presidential election wherein Vice President Kamala Harris (D) competed against former President Donald Trump (R). If successful, Harris – who became just the second woman major-party presidential nominee in U.S. history – would have been the first woman, first Black woman, and first South Asian person to be president of the United States. While neither gender nor race were sole determinants of her defeat, both were influential factors throughout the presidential contest and in ways beyond the identities of each nominee. Among some of the most salient issues were: abortion rights; rights of the transgender community; the promotion or pullback of diversity, equity, and inclusion policies; and regulation of education around gender and racial equity. In addition, candidates at and below the presidential level confronted – and in some cases fostered and leveraged – grievances around perceived gender and race-based threats. The women candidates central to this report’s analysis navigated this gendered and raced terrain of election 2024.

The bottom line is, if women vote, women win!  More women will be elected and more men who support women's issues will win!

Original post blogged on Women' Voices Media.

Tags: #gender#voting#women#women's issues


Form is loading...

Women's Voices Media

Women's thought, women's opinions, women's facts presented in a feminist point of view. We endorse works that present in an empirical and logical style.

Search

Categories

Women's Voices Media

  • Editor Byline
  • Home Page
  • Intro
  • Newsworthy

Your Voice

  • Background
  • ERA and CEDAW
  • Economic Justice
  • Education
  • Elections
  • Environment
  • Equal Representation
  • Health and Safety
  • Intersectional Issues
  • Intersectional Issues
  • Intro
  • Judicial System
  • My Voice
  • Politics & Elections
  • Reproductive Rights
  • Social Justice
  • Tech
  • Violence

HerStory

  • Background
  • Intersectional Issues
  • Social Justice
  • Women In Education
  • Women In Politics
  • Women In Science, Technology, & Math (STEM)
  • Women In Sports
  • Women In the Arts
  • Women In the Law
  • Women Not Categorized
  • Women in Business
  • Women's Health & Reproductive Rights
  • Womens Rights

Your Multimedia

  • Art
  • Background
  • Events
  • Intersectional Issues
  • Just Interesting
  • News
  • People
  • Welcome

Women's Resource Library

  • Current News
  • Diverse / Uncategorized
  • ERA and CEDAW
    • CEDAW
    • ERA
  • Environment
    • Air / Atmospheric Polution
    • Alternate Power Sources
    • Climate Change
    • Destruction of Forests and Habitats
    • Sustainability
    • Water Resources
      • Fracking
      • Waste Disposal
  • Equal Representation
    • In Business and Corporations
    • In Education (K-20)
    • In Government
    • In Law Enforcement
    • In Sports
    • In the Justice System
    • Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM)
  • Equality and Justice
    • Ableism
    • Ageism
    • Child Care
    • Economic Equality
    • Homelessness
    • LGBTQA Discrimination
    • Poverty and Hunger
    • Racism
    • Sexism
  • Gender Studies
  • General Science
  • Girls & Young Women
  • Health and Safety
    • HIV / AIDS
    • Health Insurance
    • Maternal and Infant Care
    • Medical Research
    • Paid Sick and Parental Leave
    • Pregnancy Accommodations
    • Sex Transmitted Diseases
    • Substance Addiction and Abuse
      • Opioid Crisis
      • Physician Over-prescription
  • Herstory
  • Independant Media
  • Politics
  • Reproductive Rights
    • Abortion Rights
      • Roe v. Wade
    • Contraception
  • The Arts
  • Violence
    • Ableism
    • Child Abuse
    • Date Rape
    • Domestic Violence
    • Elder Abuse
    • Genital Mutilation
    • Gun Safety and Control
    • Harrassment
    • LGBTQA - Abuse and Assault
    • Racism
    • Rape / Assault
    • Sex Trafficking / Sex Slavery
    • Women In Prison
  • World Issues

XML Feeds

  • RSS 2.0: Posts
  • Atom: Posts
What is RSS?

Women's Voices Media
This collection 2026 by Janice Jochum
Copyright 2019 United Activision Media, LLC
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
• Contact • Help • Social CMS

b2evo
Cookies are required to enable core site functionality.