HomeYour VoiceHerStoryYour MultimediaResource LibraryAbout WVMCode of ConductRegisterLog in
  • Latest Post
  • Post index
  • Archives
  • Categories
  • Latest comments
  • Contact
  • About Your Voice
  • Raise Your Voice
  • « My Personal Response To Trump by Lisa Wilson Berkowitz‎
  • Forty Seven Years of Fighting over Roe »

FDA STILL FAILING TO WARN PATIENTS OF BREAST IMPLANT RISKS

Posted by jj on Feb 03, 2020 in Health and Safety
FDA STILL FAILING TO WARN PATIENTS OF BREAST IMPLANT RISKS
FDA STILL FAILING TO WARN PATIENTS OF BREAST IMPLANT RISKS

Dozens of women who testified at a meeting of the agency’s General and Plastic Surgery Devices Advisory Committee last year pressed for the panel to recommend more long-term research and to support an expanded informed consent process that would give women a better understanding of the benefits and risks before they choose to have the implants.  These women told compelling stories of broken health, loss of jobs and effects on families.

Many of the women called for a ban on textured implants that have been linked to the cancer anaplastic large cell lymphoma or ALCL. Health authorities around the word, as well as the FDA, link this form of cancer to some implants. Researchers said there is some evidence the problem with these implants could be bacterial infections. 

Thousands of women have complained about autoimmune and connective-tissue disease caused by implants.  The FDA has repeatedly said that the “weight of evidence” does not show implants cause “systemic” illness.  Despite the fact that researchers at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center have found that silicone implants are linked to higher rates of autoimmune disorders such as scleroderma and rheumatoid arthritis than found in the general population, the FDA is skeptical and has said the study was flawed.  In its’ announcement of the committee meeting the FDA stated “there is not sufficient evidence to show an association between breast implants and rheumatologic or connective tissue disease diagnoses”.

Diana Zuckerman, president of the National Center for Health Research, presented evidence at the hearing from a study her organization conducted involving over 400 women who had their implants removed because they were having health problems.  In the vast majority of cases the women’s health improved.  Zuckerman said in an interview,” We have always said we don’t know what the percentage    is – just that for women who are sick, getting them out makes them better.”

The FDA has chosen not to ban the textured implants linked to the cancer anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL).  The agency does not believe the product meets the legal standard for being banned at this time.

“Every manufacturer of approved silicone breast implants is required to conduct post-approval studies to further evaluate safety and effectiveness of the products and to answer additional scientific questions about the long-term safety and potential risks of breast implants that their pre-market clinical trials were not designed to answer.”  These are words taken from the FDA’s announcement regarding warnings issued to two manufacturers for their failure to follow these requirements.  The agency has said further “poor compliance and changes in surgical practice over time have produced results difficult to interpret in a generalized manner much less with the precision needed to deliver personalized patient care.”  This seems to indicate the information gathered in conducting the mandatory studies over the years has not been beneficial to patients.

On October 24, 2019, in response to the thousands of complaints, the FDA issued the Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff.  It contains recommendations concerning the content and format for certain labeling information for saline and silicone gel-filled breast implants.  When finalized, the FDA recommends that patient labeling for breast implants include a patient information booklet/brochure, patient decision checklist, boxed warning and a patient device card.

Be aware that, even when finalized, these will only be recommendations.  The document is clearly labeled as containing “nonbinding recommendations”. It does not establish any legally enforceable responsibilities.  The word “should” in Agency guidance means that something is suggested or recommended, but not required.  As of this writing there has been no announcement of the draft being finalized.

We end with the question with which we began.

Is the FDA still failing to warn patients of breast implant risks?

 

REFERENCES

MD Anderson Cancer Center    https://www.mdanderson.org/newsroom/

FDA   http://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/implants-and-prosthetics/breast-implants

Washington Post, Laurie McGinley      https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/laurie.mcginley/

Original post blogged on Women' Voices Media.


Form is loading...

Women's Voices Media - Newsletter

Powered by follow.it

Search

Act Now!

  • HAVE YOU CONTACTED YOUR SENATORS AND/OR YOUR HOUSE REP TODAY?

Recent Posts

  • UNITED AIRLINES, IT'S ABOUT TIME!
  • No , anorexia is not a pretty skelletton !
  • ATTENTION VOTERS of the COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA!
  • ARE YOU READY TO FACE THE TRUTH?
  • BLACK MATERNAL HEALTH AWARENESS WEEK
  • SENTIMENTS EXPRESSED ALL OVER THE COUNTRY MARCH 28, 2026
  • WORLD WATER DAY – ACCELERATING CHANGE
  • A POIGNANT ESSAY FROM HEIDI HENRY: THE NATIONAL DEBACLE
  • Renee Nicole Good
  • Trump’s War on Mail-In Voting Threatens the Foundations of Democracy Itself
  • The GOP Is About To Devour Its Own King
  • WOMEN'S JUSTICE
  • Civil Discourse with Joyce Vance
  • Why Are Men Still Considered the Default?
  • The Animal Feed Industry’s Impact on the Planet
  • How a 20th-Century Family Planning Agenda Fueled the Climate Crisis
  • CALL YOUR SENATORS:   TELL THEM TO VOTE “NO!”
  • WHAT THE BUDGET CUTS ARE REALLY ABOUT
  • THE BATTLE FOR MAKING OUR VOICES HEARD
  • How Community Solar Can Liberate You From Fossil Fuels

Recent Comments

  • chandlerbaxter on BURN THE BARBIES, PAUSE THE PINK
  • dracorouge on FROM RI TO WI: MORE PRO-CHOICE AND PRO-ERA CANDIDATES
  • jj on OPINION: FEMINISM HAS BECOME TOO EXTREME
  • jj on OPINION: FEMINISM HAS BECOME TOO EXTREME
  • admin on THE 2ND IMPEACHMENT OF TRUMP!
  • andreajoy on VOTE!
  • marthaburk on STAND UP & SPEAK OUT!
  • admin on VOTE!
  • urbancat on VOTE!
  • marthaburk on Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) Responds to Rep. Ted Yoho (R-FL)
  • armandolibertad on Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) Responds to Rep. Ted Yoho (R-FL)
  • armandolibertad on DON'T EXPRESS OUTRAGE WITHOUT ACTION!
  • allegra22 on GET SMART AMERICA!
  • admin on My Personal Response To Trump by Lisa Wilson Berkowitz‎
  • admin on THE REAL “WELFARE QUEENS” ARE CORPORATE CEO’s

Wit & Wisdom

Women's history is an assential and indispensable part of the national narrative. By understanding the achievements,struggles, and contributions of women throughout history, we gain a fuller, more accurate. and more inclusive understanding of our collective past.
Hillary Clinton
May 2026
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            
 << <   > >>

Search

XML Feeds

  • RSS 2.0: Posts
  • Atom: Posts
More on RSS

Your Voice
This collection 2026 by Janice Jochum
Copyright 2019 United Activision Media, LLC
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
• Contact • Help • CMS with Bootstrap

Build your own site!
Cookies are required to enable core site functionality.