WVM Home HerStoryYour VoiceYour MultimediaResource LibraryAboutCode of ConductContact
Log inRegister
  • HerStory
  • Your Voice
  • Your Multimedia
  • Resource Library
  • About
  • Code of Conduct
  • Contact

  • Register
  • Recent Posts
  • Post index
  • Archives
  • Categories
  • Latest comments
  • About HerStory
  • Tell A HerStory
  • « Shirley Chisholm: Declares Presidential Bid, January 25, 1972
  • Meet the First and Only Black Queen of England »

The first woman allowed to argue Supreme Court cases

Posted by Reid Cornwell on Feb 21, 2020 in Background, Women In the Law
The first woman allowed to argue Supreme Court cases

On February 15, 1879, President Rutherford B. Hayes signed a new law that would admit women as members of the Supreme Court bar and allow them to submit and argue cases at the high court.

Suffragette, teacher, lawyer and presidential candidate Belva Lockwood championed that cause with Congress after the Supreme Court ruled that women – and specifically Lockwood – could not practice law before it. In November 1876, Chief Justice Morrison Waite curtly replied to Lockwood’s request to be admitted to the Supreme Court bar. “By the uniform practice of the Court from its organization to the present time, and by the fair construction of its rules, none but men are permitted to practice before it as attorneys and counselors,” Waite said. The Chief Justice added the Court wouldn’t change its mind unless “required by statute.”

In most cases, state courts also didn’t allow women as lawyers to argue cases at the state-court level. The Supreme Court in an 1872 opinion in Bradwell vs. Illinois confirmed the ability of Illinois to block women from its state bar. Myra Bradwell, a recent law school graduate, asked the Supreme Court to intervene, citing the 14th Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities Clause.

Justice Samuel Miller, citing the recent Slaughterhouse Cases, said the clause didn’t apply to the ability of a state to regulate its own conduct. “The right to control and regulate the granting of license to practice law in the courts of a state is one of those powers which are not transferred for its protection to the federal government,” Miller said.

Justice Joseph Bradley’s concurring opinion went much farther, stating that women weren’t fit to argue Supreme Court cases or even become lawyers. “Man is, or should be, woman’s protector and defender. The natural and proper timidity and delicacy which belongs to the female sex evidently unfits it for many of the occupations of civil life,” Story said. “The paramount destiny and mission of woman are to fulfill the noble and benign offices of wife and mother. This is the law of the Creator.”

Undaunted, Lockwood spent three years after her 1874 rejection lobbying Congress and former President Ulysses Grant (who had presented Lockwood with her law degree) for a law that would force the Supreme Court to recognize the right of women to appear before it. President Hayes signed “An act to relieve certain legal disabilities of women,” which read that “any woman who shall have been a member of the bar of the highest court of any State or Territory or of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia for the space of three years, and shall have maintained a good standing before such court, and who shall be a person of good moral character, shall, on motion, and the production of such record, be admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States.”

Lockwood had been practicing law in the District of Columbia and qualified as the first female attorney to appear before the Court, in the 1880 case Kaiser v. Stickney. Lockwood spoke for about 20 minutes in court. Lockwood didn’t prevail in that case but won her second and final case at the Supreme Court in 1906. (She also ran for president twice on the National Equal Rights Party ticket.

Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center.
The Constitution Daily
February 15, 2020 by Scott Bomboy
Editor in chief of the National Constitution Center


#womensvoicesmedia
#womensvoices
#mediawomans

Tags: female attorneys, femalesand the supremecourt, womensvoicesmedia

No feedback yet


Form is loading...

Comment feed for this post

February 2021
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28            
 << <   > >>

Search

Wit & Wisdom

Feminist (n): a) a person who believes that women should have political, economic and social rights equal to those of men. b) one who believes the implementation of feminist principles will create a more humane type of political power.

Recent Posts

  • HONORING FRANCES ELLEN WATKINS HARPER DURING BLACK HISTORY MONTH
  • Born in Slavery: Slave Narratives from the Federal Writers' Project, 1936 to 1938
  • Dr. Justina Ford
  • HONORING OUR BLACK SUFFRAGISTS
  • REMEMBERING OUR BLACK SUFFRAGISTS
  • ELIZA "LYDA" CONLEY (1868-69?-1946)
  • Meryl L. Streep : Too Ugly
  • AMANDA BLACKHORSE (1982- )
  • LILIAN ST. CYR "RED WING" (1884-19740)
  • ELOUISE PEPION COBELL (1945-2011)

Recent Comments

  • Tom Lewis on Alice Stokes Paul (1885-1977)
  • armandolibertad on Sybil Ludington: The 16-Year-Old Revolutionary Hero Who Rode Twice As Far As Paul Revere
  • armandolibertad on SONIA PRESSMAN FUENTES Feminist, Author, Public Speaker, Lawyer
  • Linda Moss on SONIA PRESSMAN FUENTES Feminist, Author, Public Speaker, Lawyer
  • svoita on Karen Uhlenbeck - The First Women to Receive the Abel Prize for Math

Recent photos

This collection 2021 by Janice Jochum
Copyright 2019 United Activision Media, LLC
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
• Contact • Help

Responsive CMS

Cookies are required to enable core site functionality. ©2021 by WVM Home.